World Wide Property Sales
Thinking Like A Developer
by Nancy Chadwick
If you understand how residential developers and builders make their buying
decisions, you will be likelier to achieve success in buying or selling land.
Some builders search for property strictly by geographic area. Others search for
parcels that would enable them to reach particular buyer submarkets, such as
housing type, price range, lifestyle and age group. Either way, they begin by
casting the net into their areas or markets of choice and sifting through
potential acquisition candidates. They often have to pick through dozens of
properties before they find one they think they can develop profitably and
frequently spend varying amounts of time, effort and money collecting
information before they even know if the parcel will work. Their due diligence
focuses on obtaining answers to five fundamental but critical questions:
What can I build?
How many can I build?
What can I sell them for?
How long will it take to sell them?
What are the costs?
These questions collectively define economic feasibility and influence every
decision developers and builders make – from their initial contact with the
property, during negotiation of the contract with the seller, through
subdivision approval, to the day of closing and beyond.
How do you estimate the value of land for residential development? For starters,
you should never price it by the acre or even think of it in terms of X$/acre.
Raw land value is not derived from the number of acres but rather from what the
property could yield, how it can be used, and the projected sale value of the
total package end product (the new home on its lot). Its value is also related
to the hard costs (i.e., costs for installing “horizontal improvements” to the
site, such as streets, curbing, sidewalks, utility lines, and house construction
costs or “vertical improvements”) and soft costs (expenses that will be incurred
during the approval process). Accordingly, residential builders and developers
do their income and expense projections for properties on a per-lot and not a
per-acre basis. For all practical purposes, the parcel’s overall size is a
meaningless number in the developer’s determination of property value.
Here’s an illustration:
Suppose there are two vacant 50 acre parcels you’re thinking about buying in the
same municipality. Zoning for Parcel A requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 SF
and width of 200 feet; Parcel B zoning requires 30,000 SF lots and 150 ft.
widths. On average, the new homes would sell for $300,000 on Parcel A and
$350,000 on Parcel B. Each parcel is fairly level with no remarkable physical
constraints. Suppose per-lot improvement costs are ball parked at $56,000 for A
and $43,500 for B.
In this scenario, Parcel A would probably be worth around $760,000 (or $19,000
per lot raw) to a builder who was buying fully-contingent. Parcel B, however,
would command a price of over $2.3 mil ($44,000/lot). The reason that there’s a
big difference in the bottom-line value of these parcels is that there are
differences in the lot yield, end product value and horizontal improvement
costs. In this example, if Parcel A were for sale at $19,000/acre, it would be
for sale for a long time because it was significantly overpriced. On the other
hand, if Parcel B were for sale at $44,000/acre, it would sell in a heartbeat
because it was greatly underpriced.
Bio:
Nancy E. Chadwick, President and Broker of Chadwick Real Estate, Inc., is a PA
licensed real estate Broker and Instructor. She entered the real estate business
in 1982 following her career in the Philadelphia legal community as an
environmental and litigation paralegal. She has specialized in land development
for most of her real estate career, achieving top-producer status in several of
her past agency affiliations. Her services have been sought by a wide range of
clients, including builders and developers, non-profit organizations, estates,
REO departments of financial institutions, medical groups, consumers and other
real estate professionals.
Her book Land Buying & Selling is based on the state-of-the-art courses she
created that have been approved by the PA Real Estate Commission (for real
estate brokers and agents) and the PA Board of Certified Real Estate appraisers
(for certified appraisers and appraiser candidates). She also teaches courses
exclusively for consumers.